terrorists?

Why is saying that all Muslims terrorists?

The question is what is always in my mind, because of all these events that the media reported the perpetrators of this incident all Muslims, whether kejdian it in domestic and overseas. Both events are small or large when viewed in terms of consequences.
We must first look at events that have been passed, the incident started from the middle east is the region that have a single clump of people, because of there small groups of people who are in the area who feel poorly treated by foreign parties, especially the State superpower that feels himself as ruler of the world and considers other countries can be conducted arbitrarily, this groups as a form of resistance against the superpower country.
Behaviors that often occur by the superpower against a nation that is in the middle east is State superpower feels himself master of high technology and considers the State in the region do not have high technology, so on this basis that this superpower wants to master the State either directly or indirectly , and in terms of this superpower State persejataan feel superior, so the desire was stronger, with the eastern area control center means can be quickly mastered petroleum because these goals as a primary goal of State powers. And do not hesitate to do that often violate religious norms in the area and partly for this reason this group is to increase resistance against the superpower country.
Forms of resistance which dlilakukan by this group performed in various forms of resistance either by directly or indirectly, ie directly dealing with this group of countries that do superpower confrontation by using his army, resistance indirectly by mengguanakan threat by aiming to weaken his mental powers and the threat many proven by the events that mengengejutkan world. This last resistance is terrorism that is often mentioned by the superpower. So obviously the so-called terrorism to small groups of nations in the region is a form of resistance groups against the State powers.
The impact of events on travel to Asian countries viewed the workings and tactics undertaken by small groups that are widely used in Asian Countries, because some Asian communities that have a lot of sympathy to volunteer and learn many of these groups. With the volunteers who go into areas that are region and the volunteers were able to see directly the incident in the region will add a strong sympathy, because many of the actions of the superpowers aleh outside the norms of the area of ​​religion and society.
Region asia region is the region most favored by the State community to come to the asia superpower in part as a tourist, this region has a very strong attraction for the region and has a stunning natural paradise for tourists who visit the asia region, they came to bringing asia customs that are different from the area, so that the culture they bring are often contrary to the customs area. His arrival into the asian culture they do not want to adjust the area, as if to create a European area asia asia.
Based on the above events there is a small group of people who are in asia was not willing to get the behavior that brought most of the tourists who do not want to adjust the local customs in asia so infuriated the group and was compounded by events in the Middle East region to strengthen his desire to warn emphatically, using the people who dare to die with melendakan himself and this incident happened on an island in asia region.
So obviously the question above is a symbol of their resistance against the rulers of the world that perform arbitrary actions if they want to change the attitude of certain resistance to them or called by the State as a terrorist superpower is unlikely, therefore, the terrorist was an expression that suggested by superpower is a form of perlawnan some communities on the act of superpower.
This entry is an expression of my mind, and moahon sorry if this record is far from the truth and if there is truth beg to serve as the considerations for good in the world.